Today.Az » Weird / Interesting » Gray whales likely survived the Ice Ages by changing their diets
08 July 2011 [17:45] - Today.Az
If ancient gray whale populations migrated and fed the same as today's whales, what happened during the Ice Ages, when their major feeding grounds disappeared? UC Berkeley and Smithsonian paleontologists argue that gray whales utilized a range of food sources in the past, including herring and krill, in addition to the benthic organisms they consume today. As a result, pre-whaling populations were two to four times greater than today's population of around 22,000.
Gray whales survived many cycles of global cooling and warming over
the past few million years, likely by exploiting a more varied diet than
they do today, according to a new study by University of California,
Berkeley, and Smithsonian Institution paleontologists.
The researchers, who analyzed California gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus)
responses to climate change over the past 120,000 years, also found
evidence to support the idea that the population of gray whales along
the Pacific Coast before the arrival of humans was two to four times
today's population, which stands at about 22,000. The whale is
considered a conservation success story because protections instituted
as early as the 1930s have allowed populations to rebound from fewer
than 1,000 individuals in the early 20th century, after less than 75
years of systematic whaling.
"There almost certainly were higher gray whale populations in the
past," said evolutionary biologist David Lindberg, a UC Berkeley
professor of integrative biology who coauthored the paper with his
former student, Nicholas D. Pyenson, now curator of fossil marine
mammals at the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C. The paper appears on July
6 in the online, open-access journal PLoS ONE.
Lindberg and Pyenson suggest that higher populations in the past were
possible because gray whales utilized a greater variety of food
resources -- resources that today's whales are only now beginning to
exploit. According to Lindberg, gray whales were once thought to feed
only by suctioning seafloor sediment and filtering out worms and
amphipods -- so-called benthic organisms. But some whales are now eating
herring and krill as well, just like their baleen whale relatives,
which include the humpback and the blue.
Some whales are even dropping out of the migratory rat race. One
group hangs out year-round off Vancouver Island in Canada, where they
chase herring and krill.
"We propose that gray whales survived the disappearance of their
primary feeding ground by employing generalist filter-feeding modes,
similar to the resident gray whales found between northern Washington
State and Vancouver Island," the scientists wrote in their paper.
"A combination of low population numbers and a species migrating
between places where humans didn't bother them gave us the impression
that gray whales have a stereotypical migratory and feeding behavior
that may not be historically correct," Lindberg said.
The new population numbers accord with a 2007 estimate that the
California gray whale population was likely 76,000 to 120,000 before
humans began hunting them. That estimate, by Stephen Palumbi of Stanford
University and his collaborators, was based on an analysis of gray
whale genetic diversity.
The numbers clash, however, with claims by some ecologists that
populations of between 15,000 and 20,000 are likely the most that the
Pacific Coast -- specifically along the whales' 11,000 kilometer (6,900
mile) migratory route from Baja California to the Bering Sea -- could
support, today or in the past.
"Our data say that, if the higher estimates are right, gray whales
would have made it through the Ice Ages in numbers sufficiently large to
avoid bottlenecking," Pyenson said. "If gray whale populations were at
the lower levels, they would only have squeaked through the ice ages
with populations of hundreds or a few thousand. That would have left
bottlenecking evidence in their DNA."
Bottlenecking is when populations drop so low that inbreeding becomes
common, decreasing the genetic diversity in the species and making them
less able to adapt to environmental change.
The new assessment is good news for gray whales, which appear to have
"a lot more evolutionary plasticity than anyone imagined," Lindberg
said. This could help them survive the climate change predicted within
the next few centuries that is characterized by an expected sea level
rise of several meters.
"I suspect the gray whales will be among the winners in the great climate change experiment," Pyenson said.
Lindberg and Pyenson initiated the study several years ago in the
face of conflicting and contentious estimates for past gray whale
populations. They thought that an understanding of how gray whales
adapted to climate change over the past 3 million years, the period
called the Pleistocene, might provide insight into how they will adapt
to climate change today.
Since gray whales arose -- the oldest fossils date from 2.5 million
years ago -- Earth has gone through more than 40 major cycles of warming
and cooling, each of which significantly affected the world's flora and
fauna. During the last glacial cold spell, between 50,000 and 10,000
years ago, most of the large terrestrial mammals disappeared through a
combination of climate change and human depredation, Lindberg noted. The
marine realm, however, experienced almost no extinctions and very few
new originations during that same period.
The California, or eastern, gray whale, one of two surviving
populations of gray whale, can be traced back about 150,000-200,000
years. Pyenson and Lindberg looked closely at only the past 120,000
years, during which Earth transitioned from a warm period to a glacial
period and then to today's warmer climate.
During the glaciated period, ocean water became locked up in
land-based glaciers, drawing down the sea level by about 120 meters, or
nearly 400 feet. That drop eliminated nearly 60 percent of the Bering
Sea Platform, a shallow area that is part of the continental shelf and
the major summer feeding area for today's gray whales. Gray whales can
engage in benthic feeding no deeper than about 75 meters (250 feet),
Pyenson said, and during the glacial period, waters offshore of the
Bering platform would have been much deeper than that.
"If gray whales were primarily feeding on the Bering Platform, it's
hard to see how they could have avoided a population crash," Lindberg
said.
By calculating the amount of food lost because of dropping sea
levels, and combining this with estimates of the food needed to keep a
whale alive, the two researchers calculated the impact of global cooling
on gray whale populations and the populations that would have had to
exist in order for the whales to survive.
They concluded that populations would have had to have alternative
feeding modes sufficient to support a population of around 70,000 during
warm periods so that population drops during glacial periods wouldn't
be below 5,000-10,000 whales. Much lower numbers would have produced a
genetic bottleneck obvious in the DNA of the whales, and such a
signature has not yet been seen.
"We don't yet have the ability to look deep enough into the whale
genome to see this type of bottleneck," Pyenson added, though genetic
analysis that has been done shows no evidence of a bottleneck much
shallower in time, just before humans targeted the mammals for whaling.
The carrying capacity of the North Pacific could have been as high as
170,000, "assuming modern day values for benthic productivity, food
density, and gray whale energetics," the authors concluded. If gray
whales also exploited non-benthic organisms, such as krill, the
populations could have been even higher.
If gray whales do respond well to the rising temperatures and sea
levels predicted for the future, that may not be true for the birds and
other marine mammals that feed in the Bering Sea, one of the most
productive marine ecosystems during the summer.
"If this environment disappears in glacial maxima, we really need to
rethink what we know about the ecological history of all the other
organisms that make a living in the Bering Sea," Pyenson said. He and
Lindberg urge other scientists to focus on the historical ecology of
species to fully understand their complex interactions with a changing
environment.
"We really make a lot of conservation decisions without a lot of
data," Lindberg said. "Integrating paleontological and geological data
in the context of known ecological traits can help us address impending
biological changes in marine ecosystems."
The work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the
Smithsonian Institution.
Pyenson performed part of this research while a post-doctoral fellow
at the University of British Columbia. Lindberg is also a member of the
Center for Computational Biology and the Museum of Paleontology at UC
Berkeley. /Science Daily/
|