|
The canine
“mini-me” reveals a narcissistic tendency within us all – a trait that may also
be shaping your love life, says David Robson. (Photography by Gerrard
Gethings.)
Go to any
park, and you will see the strange phenomenon of the canine mini-me. Maybe it’s
a bearded hipster, accompanied by a little bundle of fur that looks like it went
to the same barber, or a pugnacious thug carrying a bulldog. Or perhaps it’s an
athletic jogger and her Afghan hound, their glossy locks blowing effortlessly
in the wind.
Why do people
choose the dog that looks most like themselves? Far from being skin-deep, the
answer may give you a new appreciation of the intense bonds we humans have
forged with our four-legged friends. Indeed, there are some strange and
unexpected parallels with the way we choose our other, two-legged life
partners.
Michael Roy
at the University of California, San Diego was one of the first psychologists
to put the idea to the test. Going to three nearby dog parks, he photographed
the pooches and the owners separately, and then asked a group of participants
to try to match them up. Despite no additional cues, he found that they were
able to work out who lived with whom with reasonable
accuracy. The result has since been repeated many times.
(Importantly, the resemblance may be slight but noticeable; not all bulldog
owners will look like their faces have been squeezed through a wringer.)
Admittedly,
the result only holds for pure-bred dogs (not mongrels) and it’s sometimes
based on superficial appearances: women with long hair are more likely to
prefer dogs with long, floppy ears, and heavier people tend to have fatter
dogs. Yet it also shows itself in more subtle features, such as subtledifferences in the shapes of the eyes that
are shared between pooch and person. Indeed, when the eyes of the photos were
covered, it became much harder for participants to make the connection.
Maybe this is
all due to the allure of familiarity: a dog may seem more comforting if it
resembles the other members of our family, who we know and love. Yet some
psychologists believe it might be a spill over from the way we evolved to find
mates: dating someone that looks like us may ensure that their genes are
generally compatible with our own. Thanks to this imprinting, we may therefore
prefer anything that looks a bit like us. (Along these lines, people also tend
to choose cars on the same basis – someone with a slightly squarer jaw might
prefer a car with more brutish fender, for instance. And as a result,their cars also tend to resemble their
dogs.)
Importantly,
our narcissism isn’t just skin deep: we don’t just go for people who look like
us, we also tend to orbit people who share our personalities too. (Shared
traits can even predict a couple's satisfaction in their marriage.) A couple of
years ago, Borbala Turcsan at Eotvos University in Budapest decided to test
whether the same was true of our canine soulmates. “The relationship with a dog
is a very special one – they are not simply a pet but a family member, a
friend, or a companion – so we thought it might develop in parallel with those
other relationships,” she says.
The very idea
of a dog personalitymay seem
dubious to some, but previous experiments had shown that human traits such as
extroversion can correspond to objective measures of the dog’s behaviour – such
as whether they were aggressive with strangers, or whether they are shy and
spend more time hiding behind their owner’s legs. There is now even a canine
version of the “Big Five” questionnaire typically used to measure the most
important dimensions of personality: neuroticism, extraversion,
conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness. The doggy version is based on
simple behavioural measures, such as whether it “tends to be lazy” or “tends to
be cold and aloof”.
Sure enough,
Turcsan found that the dogs and their owners both tended to show similar
personality profiles. “It was actually higher than the similarity found in
married couples and friends,” she says. Importantly, the correlation couldn’t
be explained by the amount of time the dogs and their owners had spent living
together, so it didn’t seem that the dog had simply learnt to ingratiate itself
by copying the owner. Instead, the personality seemed to be part of the dog’s
appeal in the first place. Perhaps it’s wise that we choose these companions to
be so compatible: the average dog does, after all, outlive the average marriage.
It is
awe-inspiring to think of how this relationship first emerged. Humans started
domesticating dogs as much as 30,000 years ago to help us with hunting, but
slowly we have bred these creatures in our own image, allowing us to forge an
intense emotional bond that crosses the natural boundaries between our species.
Today, they
look like us, act like us, and – unlike other humans – they always reciprocate
our feelings. In many ways they are the better reflections of our own true
natures. It’s little wonder we now consider them man’s best friend.