|
Accused of corruption
in his own country and repressions elsewhere in the world, President Macron is
trying to reignite war in the Caucasus
Until 2020, there were no tensions or coldness
in Azerbaijan-France relations. All the presidents of the fifth republic, from
Mitterrand to Hollande, treated Azerbaijan with respect. However, for more than
three years now, the relations between the two states have almost reached the
level of hostility. And this is due entirely to the flawed policy of Paris
under Macron, which is detached from normal political thinking and contradicts
the principles of equitable partnership.
France’s insidious face was revealedin the person of Macron
France is engaged in renewed provocations,
insidious smear campaigns and shallow state-level attempts at creating a split against
Azerbaijan almost on a daily basis. It usually carries out these actions through
the media. For example, an article entitled “A dictator who wants to
destabilize France”was recently published in the French magazine “Le Point”. All
sentences of this article, which is part of yet another anti-Azerbaijani attack
ordered by the Elysee Palace, represent a distortion of facts. In particular, the
article, full of libel and slander, portrays Azerbaijan as the main cause of
the tensions between the two countries. The article also attempts to attack
Azerbaijan, the country’s leadership, as well as the reputation of the
Non-Aligned Movement. It claims that Azerbaijan allegedly interferes in the
internal affairs of France and conducts a smear campaign against France hosting
the summer Olympic Games. It is stressedthat participants in the events
organized by the Baku Initiative Group are separatists and that the media
publishing objective articles about Azerbaijan are “puppets”.
We can begin by saying that it is clear from the
mentioned article which media outlet is actually a puppet. “Le Point” and other
similar publicationsfed by instructions from the Elysee Palace have become a
tool in the insidious campaign against Azerbaijan ordered by French political
circles. It is also evident that, just like the French political establishment,
the media of this country are unable to come to terms with Azerbaijan’s Shusha
and Khankendi victories and the elimination of the separatist regime.
In general, the Armenian factor has
historically been quite strong in French society. The prevalence of
pro-Armenian positions in the political circles of this country is nothing new.
French authorities have always stood by Armenia in support of its policy of
aggression. The only difference is that during the process of negotiations,
France did not take such insidiously patronizing and provocative steps as obviously
as it does now.
However, as developments in the Patriotic War
of 2020 entered the crucial stage, the infamous face of France was revealed in
the person of President Macron.
We will talk about this in more detail, but
first let's note that after Macron was elected president, France began to
behave not as a country with great statecraft traditions at the global level,
but ratherlike pirates of the Middle Ages or, to put it figuratively, like the
hot-tempered musketeers of A. Dumas.
Not only international political experts but
also France’s own analysts are convinced that after Macron's ascent to power
France departed from the traditions of statehood that had been formed over decades
andabandoned its image of a moderate and influential state that establishes
normal partnerships with everyone and ensures its hegemony with justice.
US intelligence's “Elysee Operation”
But whydid such drastic changes suddenly occur
in French public policy? We believe that we can find an answer to our question
if we pay attention to the course of the 2017 presidential election in France.
It is well known that Macron was not a recognizable
figure in French political circles until the start of the presidential election
campaign. Butall of a sudden, it was as if some invisible hand started a “cleaning”
operation during the presidential election in France. Leaders of influential
political parties were sidelinedfrom the campaign by means of blackmail and
criminal cases opened against them. An event unprecedented in the entire history
of the fifth republic occurred at the time: François Hollande, the previous
president of the country, suddenly announced that he would not run for a second
term although he could.
In addition, the 2017 election was the first
in the history of the fifth republic when republican and socialistcandidates did
not make it to the second round.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former president
of the International Monetary Fund who was tipped as the runaway candidateat the
time, was one of those closed out of the election. He had been accused of sexual
harassment and rape. Although no substantial evidence was provided, Dominique
Strauss-Kahn was removed from the election through blackmail and pressure.
This opened all roads ahead of Macron, whom no
one knew. As “Azerbaijan” newspaper, we cannot say for sure what that invisible
hand was, but the French public and political experts are unanimous on this
issue: the secret hand that gave the “green light” to Macron's ascent to power
in France was US intelligence. In other words, Macron's election as president
took place on the basis of a scenario prepared by US intelligence, or as a
result of “ElyseeOperation”.
French media: “Corruption in Macron's administration did not
exist even in the royal palace”
As mentioned above, Macron was not a
well-known figure of the apolitical French public. Although he was brought to
presidency because his real opposition had been “neutralized”, his current ratingsare
significantly lower because none of the populist promises he made and reforms announced
have come true. Macron is the most loathed politician of the French people now.
The unknown Macron also differed from all preceding
French presidents for his personal characteristics and biography.
Although some try to explain his marriage to a
woman 25 years older than him with the standard phrase “love knows no age”, the
marriage with the mother of his classmate, a theater teacher, is not universally
welcome even in French society. The French are tolerant to personal freedoms,
of course, but the moral values of gerontophiliac (great age difference between
husband and wife) Macron, the family institution he often refers to, his
lifestyle and personal orientationshave been quite astonishing even for the freedom-oriented
French society. Because his secret meetings with Brigitte Auziere, the mother
of the couple’s three children, completely contradict all moral codes existing
in the world.
We recall that at Macron's insistence, Brigitte
Auziere separated from her husband, banker Andre-Louis Auziere in 2006. In
2007, 54-year-old Brigitte Auziere married 30-year-old Macron. According to
psychologists, Macron has a psychologicalpathology or trauma. Because a man's
desire to marry a woman 25 years older than himself is not understandable even
from the standpoint of love. It is likely that Macron suffered some trauma in
his youth, which later turned into a pathology.
According to political scientists and experts
who have evaluated this situation, such a person can hold a certain position in
France. Just as Macron was able to rise to the position of Minister of Economy,
Industry and Digital Affairs, but someone morally corrupt does not deserve to
be president.
The leadership of a person with such an eroded
morality has led France to the degradation of state values and foreign policy.
It is no coincidence that during Macron's presidency, France was ignominiously
expelled from Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger. There are currently high tensions
between France and the Islamic world.
The special relationship all of Macron's
predecessors had with Morocco is no longer there. In Algeria, private schools
have been banned from conducting teaching in French. France is widely believed
to be an unreliable partner among members of the European Union. Even Ukraine
can nottrust France in its war with Russia.
Macron did not attend the annual UN General
Assembly session in September in 2023. Doesn’t the head of a state that is a
permanent member of the UN Security Council, a leading member of the European
Union and a member of NATO have anything to say? Before that, in the summer of
2023, the French president faced a problem when trying to get an invitation to
the BRICS summit in Johannesburg. The leadership of the Republic of South
Africa considered his invitation request “very funny”.
All this is an indication of the fiasco of the
French foreign policy, as well as a confirmation that Macron is not perceived
as a figure to reckon with at the global level.
As for the domestic situation of France, the
protests of the “yellow vests” and farmers' actions are evidence of the failuresin
the domestic policy. The country’s economic and industrial cloutis gradually dwindling
and the state debt has reached astronomical levels.
To cut the long story short, Macron's foreign
and domestic policies constantly show instability, consistent errors and
contradictions. In general, he can be consideredas the most unsuccessful leader
of France.
France is now known in the world as a country
where corruption is pervasive at state level and where dirty money is being laundered.
There are hundreds of facts of bribery, tax evasion, illegal patronage and
other similar acts of the president, his entourage, members of parliament,
municipal leaders and representatives of the ruling party.
Macron's administration consistently puts pressure
on law enforcement agencies and courts so that these criminal acts are not even
recorded, not to mention their not being investigated. The statement of the
French media that “corruption in the Macron administration did not exist even
in the royal palace” fully exposes the criminal nature of the French
government.
Wiping the nose of Macron and French political circles
As we mentioned earlier, after Macron's had
come to power, France moved away from the values of civilized statehood it hadcreated
over the past decades and even returned to the thinking of the Middle Ages.
This is also evident in the fact that France started to carry out its colonial
policy in Africa, Asia and Oceania in a more reactionary form in recent years although
France continued to have a say in these regions. But Macron, without any
explanation, took the path of creating military and political conflicts and
internal strife in various regions.
Thus, precisely after the start of Macron's presidency,
France's colonialist practices reverted to the medieval style, as the French
state began to repeat the policy of expansion it had historically pursued in
those territories but in a more brutal fashion.
In the countries where such confrontations
took place, there were no developments that would have been aimed against the
interests of France. Even French experts did not conceal their surprise as to
why France artificially aggravated the situation in those countries. This was a
rhetorical question because the French knew very well that the artificial
conflicts that took place in the said regions were ordered by the global network
that brought Macron to power – theUnited States.
Let's return to Macron's strained relations
with Azerbaijan. France's attitude towards Azerbaijan changed as soon as Macronwas
electedpresident. The reactionary principles incompatible with civilized
political relations were manifested in Macron's policy in relation to the Caucasus.
As we mentioned at the beginning of the article, pro-Armenian positions have
always prevailed in France, but this did not prevent the previous presidents of
France from maintaining friendly relations with Azerbaijan. France never openly
opposed Azerbaijan, and support for Armenians was expressed only in words. Whenever
there was support for Armenia, the French officials did not explicitly talk
about it.
But during Macron's time in power, France
became a direct participant in the military-political conflict between
Azerbaijan and Armenia. This became evident during the 44-day war, as France
acted as a state that unequivocally supported Armenia’s policy of occupation both
during and after the war.
After 2020, France, unable to come to terms
with Azerbaijan's victory in the Patriotic War, repeatedly tried to have various
documents adopted against our country within the framework of international
organizations, especially the UN Security Council. Azerbaijan managed to resolutely
prevent this thanks to its successful foreign policy and friends.
Let's pay attention to the chronological
sequence of France's open hostility towards Azerbaijan. First, during the days
of war, Macron repeatedly called President IlhamAliyev, sometimes demanding
that Azerbaijan stop military operations, sometimes accusing Azerbaijan of
targeting civilian Armenians in Karabakh, and sometimes saying that foreign
mercenaries were “fighting” in the ranks of the Azerbaijani army. However,
Macron understood from the very first demand that it was impossible to threaten
or turn Azerbaijan off its path. His accusations were never corroborated. All
this was Macron's first defeat against Azerbaijan.
In October 2020, France attempted another ugly
campaign of pressure against Azerbaijan at the level of the UN Security
Council. At that time, after a closed-door session of the SC, a draft statement
was prepared by Minsk Group co-chair countries and distributed among member
countries for approval. However, the draft did not mention a word about the
resolutions the SC had adopted in 1993, which demanded the withdrawal of
Armenian troops from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan. The states that
are members of the Non-Aligned Movementrepresented on the SC insisted that such
a reference should be included in the statement. After that, the co-chair
countries that had authored the document were forced to withdraw it.
By this Azerbaijan actually defeated France “on
its home court”. In November 2020, the adoption of a resolution in the French
Parliament with a call for the recognition of the separatist regime in
Nagorno-Karabakh was, in fact, an indicator of Paris's defeat to Azerbaijan.
They knew perfectly well themselves that this resolution was nothing more than
a piece of paper.
In December 2022, when Azerbaijan's
eco-activists staged an action on the road to Lachin, Macron's France turned to
the UN yet again, accusing Azerbaijan of keeping Armenians in Karabakh in
blockade, but it suffered another political and diplomatic defeat.
France failed in the European Union and the
UN. Allof its initiatives against our country were never supported. Countless
phone calls to Macron's counterparts in the West have been unsuccessful. In
January this year, the French senate adopted a ridiculous resolution regarding
the government's imposition of sanctions against Azerbaijan. The French
political circles led by Macron, who lost his life instincts back in his youth,
probably does not understand that this is a meaningless document. Because if
they had understood this, they would not have brought their statehoodto such a
disgraceful state.
If we add to all this Emmanuel Macron's
groundless claims against Azerbaijan made during a press conference at the
Granada meeting of the European Political Community in October 2023, French Europe
and Foreign Affairs Minister Catherine Colonna's absurd allegations against our
country in the Senate, and the fact that France sent its emissaries to the
border with Azerbaijan under the guise of observers, we will see that
Azerbaijan actually defeated France on all platforms over the past three years.
Yet another defeat inflicted on Macron's
France was Azerbaijan’s exposure of the French intelligence network, which
operates in a wide geographical area stretching from Eastern Europe to Central
Asia. The professionalism and vigilance of the Azerbaijani side angered
Emmanuel Macron and led to the dismissal and replacement of heads of the French
foreign intelligence agencies. This was another defeat for Macron. In response
to the expulsion of two French diplomats from Azerbaijan due to the exposed French
intelligence network, two Azerbaijanidiplomats were declaredpersonas non grata
by Paris, which was an indication of not only France's defeat, but also its weakness.
Such has been the hypocritical trajectory of
Macron's government over the past three years. Moreover, he shamelessly sought to
participate in normalization talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan as a party
pursuing the interests of Armenia. However, IlhamAliyev personally removed Macron
from negotiationsonce and for all.
France is constantly trying to poke its nose
into the processes in the Caucasus through Armenia, but each time the noses of
French political circles, including that of Macron, are wiped. The restoration
of Azerbaijan's sovereignty in Karabakh and the handcuffing of separatists
financed directly from France was a slap on the face of Macron and French policies
in general. Azerbaijan erased from history the separatist regime, which called
on the French government to recognize its independence.
In fact, the policiesbeing implemented by
France cannot be unequivocally described as pro-Armenian. Armenians capable of assessing
the situation more soberly also believe that France's policy does not reflect Armenia's
interests. After all, this policy serves to prevent Armenia’s economic
development, make it a deadlock state, and stop the normalization of relations
with Azerbaijan.
France's pro-Armenian policy actually leads
Armenia to destruction and promises it even greater defeats, misery and
isolation in the future. This policy puts Armenia in a situation of conflict in
the region not only with Azerbaijan, but also with Iran, Russia and even
Georgia. In this sense, there is no doubt that France's actions will eventually
turn Armenia into the Lebanon of the region. In the end, Paris’s insidious
policies will bring Armenia to the state of Lebanon, which simply drowns in
political-military tensions.
Azerbaijan is creating an international platform against
France's colonial policy
Azerbaijan does not destroy only France's
pro-Armenian policy and hypocrisy towards itself. Azerbaijan also exposes the
colonial policy of France and supports the freedom struggles in the territories
France still controls in different parts of the world. It is commonly known
that France has committed genocidal crimes against millions of people in
Africa, Asia, America and Oceania for centuries, depriving people of their
freedom and destroying their statehood.
The results of French colonial policy are truly
astonishing. For example, in the 132-year-long occupation of Algeria, more than
1.5 million people were killed by the French state, which is why Algeria is described
as “a country of 1.5 million martyrs”. A total 18,000 skulls of soldiers killed
in colonial wars in the 19thcentury are stored and displayed in the
Museum of Man in Paris. Among those “exhibits” are the skulls of Algerian
warriors. Algeria's request to return those bones has yet to be fulfilled by
France. In the 21stcentury, one can find such despicable conduct
only in a handful of countries of the world.
The scale and geography of the massacres
perpetrated by the French army is so vast that it is difficult to enumerate
them all. Morocco, Tunisia, Mali, Djibouti, Nigeria, Chad, Senegal, Vietnam, the
Comoros, Haiti and other countries are still living through the consequences of
their occupation.
Although centuries have passed, new shameful
methods of French colonialism are still continuing because the mindset has not
changed. Unable to abandon the dark history of colonialism, France does not
respect the freedom dreams and rights of the peoples living outside Europe, in
the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and works hard to prevent the realization of
these dreams. For example, Guadeloupe has been under French rule for four
centuries. Those in the country attempting to struggle for independence are
killed and subjected to persecution.
The natural resources of Martinique, a French
colony, are plundered and its population is enslaved.
As a result of the colonial policy of France,
French Guiana has been made financially and economically dependent, gold mines have
been looted, while gold has been extracted and transported to France.
Those who venture to dream of independence on
the island of Corsica are either arrested or killed by France. Repression has
become commonplace for the Corsican people. Although France has been giving
them false promises for years, only those appointed by France come to power in
Corsica.
It is a pity that the global community has
ignored the colonial policy of France throughout history. However, Azerbaijan's
resolute actions in this direction do not just expose France's colonial crimes,
Baku also chastises France's colonialist policy.
“Azerbaijan is very concerned about the
continuation of colonialism in the 21stcentury and the growing new
manifestations of colonialism. Despite the passage of nearly 70 years since the
Bandung Conference, there are still countries pursuing colonialist policies.
One and the first of such countries is France. In general, most of the bloody
crimes in the history of colonialism were committed by France. France, which
occupied dozens of countries in Africa, Southeast Asia, the Pacific Ocean and
Latin America, has plundered their natural wealth and enslaved their people for
decades, committed numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity in those territories.
The French armed forces have subjected hundreds of thousands of civilians to
genocide because of their ethnic and religious affiliation.” These views were expressed
in the letter of President IlhamAliyev to the participants of the international
conference on “Neocolonialism: Violation of Human Rights and Injustice” held in
Baku on October 20, 2023. Most importantly, the letter was released as an
official UN document. As can be seen, Azerbaijan is using from all
international platformsto expose the criminal acts Francehas been committing for
centuries and continues to commit to this day. France wants to create tensions
in the South Caucasus by arming Armenia and obstructing the peace process.
There is hardly any country in history has dealt such blows to France’s colonial
policy.
Azerbaijan isolates and rejects both Macron and France from the
processes in the Caucasus
In general, France's actions are already
causing disgust in other countries of the region. Maria Zakharova, the spokesperson
for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, also said that the goal of the
West and France is to turn the South Caucasus into another arena of conflict. “They
ignore the interests of the countries of the region and do nothing to ensure
security, stability and prosperity in the region. I think that Baku and some other
countries are already fed up with such conduct on the part of Paris, which is
trying to restore its collapsed political authority in the South Caucasus.”
All of France's attempts to infiltrate the
South Caucasus, put pressure on Azerbaijan, etc. have failed. However, it is a
fact that by arming Armenia, France worked flat out to create a basis for war
in the South Caucasus. However, the arms exports to Armenia is dealing a blow
to the peace process. The aim of Paris is to establish a military presence on the
Armenia-Azerbaijan border,instigate new clashes and even achieve a resumption
of hostilities. This policy of France increases the risk of military tensions
in the South Caucasus, prompts Armenia, which has found new “supporter” in the
military field, to put forward non-constructive demands in the peace negotiations
and prolong the process.
The fact that one of the generals of the
French National Gendarmerie Department recently approached the border with
Azerbaijan from the territory of Armenia and observed it with binoculars
strengthens the possibility that France intends to commit military provocation
against Azerbaijan. The French general's approach to our borders, following the
shipment of arms, certainly indicates France's insidious intentions. Paris is
trying to re-ignite the historical conflict by artificial means and, as a
result, drag Armenia into even more severe defeats. A new war will inevitably
lead to the complete collapse of Armenia.
It goes without saying that a military
operation supported by France will only take a toll on Armenia. “Armenia should
also understand that no matter how many weapons it may buy and how much support
it may receive, if there is a source of danger for us, we will immediately crush
that source of danger. I am not hiding this so that no one can say tomorrow
that they didn’t see that coming,” President IlhamAliyev said.
President IlhamAliyev declared Azerbaijan's
attitude towards France in several speeches. Obviously, IlhamAliyev does not view
Macron as an impartial president. Azerbaijan does not recognize France as a participant
or partner state in the process of normalization with Armenia. Azerbaijan
isolates and rejects both Macron and France from the processes in the Caucasus.
In turn, Macron has undermined the authority of
France in the world. Macron has created such global problems for France that
Paris will need decades to solve them in the future. There are countless ticking
bombs Macron has planted inside France. France is also the second most hated
country in the world today – next only to the United States. What else would
one expect from a country led by a person with psychological pathology?
To understand that Macron has psychological
problems, it is enough to look at his appointments to fateful positions of the
country. Instead of French women known throughout history for their charm and
beauty, he has appointedIslamophobic“males” who hate women as prime minister
and foreign minister.
Azerbaijan will continue exposing France
After Azerbaijan’s brilliant victories over
France, the foreign policy/diplomacy department of the French presidential administration
was in a state of hysteria, resorting to such hypocritical articles in an
effort to get out of the “lamentable defeat”. According to E. Macron, Armenia’s
occupation should have continued. Armenian occupation was successfully
supported by E. Macron's predecessors, but the fact that it ended during E.
Macron's rule is seen as his personal defeat. He can'tcome to terms with the
idea that he has been defeated, not just Armenia.
Emmanuel Macron's personality traits also play
a special role in France's policy of hostility towards Azerbaijan. Macronhas earned
himself the image of a henpecked gerontophiliac, i.e. someone afraid of his
wife. He can barely control his envy, which has turned into hatred towards
victorious President IlhamAliyev. Just like envious children, he tries to do “mischiefs”against
a strong, powerful and victorious political leader, President IlhamAliyev, who
has won the support of his nation.
Azerbaijan will continue exposing France.
Azerbaijan will continue to show the true colors of the French government to
the world and support the struggle of the occupied overseas territoriesfor
independence. The flag of France can flyin the Caucasusonly in the embassies of
this country. Today,the flag of Azerbaijan flies in New Caledonia and French
Polynesia. It is no coincidence that the people of the countries under the
colonial rule of France now look at Azerbaijan as a holy temple.
This is a victory of IlhamAliyev and
Azerbaijan over France, Macron and the entire pro-Armenian gang...
Editorial team of “AZERBAIJAN”
newspaper